Giridhari Unified Field Theory


In respect of Professors Feynman and Einstein, I hope people can consider and explore what binds the energy types discussed in this UFT (such as in photons) together: success here will undoubtably reveal a much newer and fresher Universe!
I learned from study of the Feynman Lectures that the world of physics (and mathematics) has a very thick skin on it: and we are NOT meant to disturb so much that skin. Doing so would preclude and indefinitely prevent the wonderous discovery of what lies on the other side of that skin, which we can arrive at without interference of the skin of physics or ourselves (which implies that physics and mathematics are peaceful sciences) : that within the skin of physics and mathematics is a nest, a shelter, like the interior of a thunderegg geode, filled with amethyst crystals, never seen but there to know and behold and share. Once one makes THIS discovery, as long as one observes protocol and etiquette one can experience a new wonder as fresh as can be, that physics and mathematics can and does protect one and all
Universal Fields

---

Three fundamental forms of energy are,

Ee, electric
Ek, kinetic
Em magnetic


Each exists in two forms:

potential [fields],
free [radiation]




This gives us electrical energy, and electrostatic energy,
kinetic energy, and kinetostatic energy (currently considered to be called Gravity),
magnetic energy, and magnetostatic energy (or magnetic fields)

All other forms of energy are based (or compounded) of these free and potential forms


including: Mass,
Nuclear forces

The structure of mass
Mass is compounded by the layering of energy of many photons, which are coiled lke the bicycle brake cable can be coiled before it is put in the sheath... like when you buy a new one, for safe storage for example. This coil orbits a theoretical centre in a spiral, and itself coils on itself again lie the bike cable, further and further until a fluid property of field expression presents or appears around a radiated toroid, making fundamental objects with mass that are basically spherical
The energy is harmonic with itself, and tends toward condensation as a single body with a speed of light wavetrain in a tight orbit, with many photons in it. This gives it properties such as independence from free energy in radiation form, such as, that it's momentum exists even when it is at rest
_____________________________________o_____________________________________

Einstein's relativity relies on time to erect a inertial frame of reference.
However, superlating this, I propose that time does not exist

Instead, that is, in it's place there is momentum.
What, you ask. How can time not exist?
It is like this:
Whilst we have constructed timepieces to synchronise our goingsabout, and while our goingsabout are real, and while there is a pause between the passing of the zeroeth second and the first on a clock etc., there is nothing in the universe that you can put in a container and call it time.
All you have to do is consider what makes a clock go.
Indeed, if you are a photon, and therefore travelling at the speed of light, you never experience time.
And yet we exist and coexist in the same universe as photons without a thought about this.
Rather than argue this point to exhaustion, I will explain momentum in it's own terms.
All oscillations have a momentum. The procession of the planets, the orbit of those celestial bodies, the galaxies, the whole universe is oscillating at some frequency of other.
And you may say that well, yes, and these things do not happen at the speed of light, so they do take time to happen. And I would have to agree. The context in which this use of the word "time" is important. It is real and not practical to argue that across the human race we never speak of time in this sense again.
Now, you may ask, what is the difference between this contextual time, and time itself?
Consider the universe before Einstein. Energy was consiered real, but not understood to the same extent as it then became after relativity, when we could look at a small piece of matter, and calculate how much free energy there was in it if it was completely liberated as electromagnetic energy, by E=mc²
Also, before the Earth was know to be a round spheroid, people considered it flat. It stayed flat forever as far as one went, so it *had* to be so, flat.
It is a paradigm we are considering. I propose, in all due respect of Albert Einstein, that theory before this one should recognise time unless life requires otherwise.
So why is it useful to consider the universe as being without time, but having momentum which carries it onward in is procession of a wave or oscillating frequency?
It is useful because as soon as on tries, one sees it for what it really is.


There are waves.

There are periods of waves.

How, but you say, can there be periods, if there is no time for a period to exist in? Periods are descibed in terms of space and momentum, distance per momentum There are wavelengths measuable in SI distance units such as metres.


Processes that function correctly oscillate between a state of action and recovery



Energies which oscillate have a period and an orbit and a wavelength.
Now you have read this far, and when I type without time but with momentum there are two things which I can report:
That it is harder to type, yet it is more pure a reality, though having bever been typed before in my existance it is therefore a fair amount of work to overcome in order for me to type it.
Once typed however, it is clear as can be that it is indeed possible for such a reality

This is relaxed when I mention that I believe and understand this reality as I describe it.
If I now refer back to the universe with the photon... this photon never sees time and yet we see photons (all the time :)
Might I suggest one consider that by using chronometers constructed of matter comprising electromagnetic energy (protons, neutrons, electrons and momentum and mass) that we actually "create" a phenomenom that is and has an electromagnetic signature which we could easily confuse as being time? And by synchronising our chronometers we could become oblivious to this pseudophenomenom? That we could even believe it??
Don't believe it. Don't be fooled so
Neutrons: are in fact a magneton with a magnetic charge but no electrical charge due to their being comprised of what happens if one allows a electron to be absorbed into a proton, possibly an occurrance at 0.0 Kelvins but possibly causable through suitable electrostatic interaction such as a laser cooling system
We must be able to coexist with the photon as we accept they are real and they are clearly defined by physics to have an electrical component and a magnetic component. What I propose above is that they also have a kinetic component. You say, well, of course. But we don't describe them as such, when I think we should.

Structure of a photon A photon is the same as conventionally considered, but additional to the two waves of electrical and magnetic energy is a third, kinetic energy wavelet
Light has a constant speed c = 2.99x10⁸ m/s
Notw it is said that in a dense medium light slows down
I say this is nonsense!
Before you aregue about experimental fact, let me qualify my assertion: in a dense medium such as glass, light must navigate a longer path than it does in a vacuum. This is because light is electromagnetokinetic energy. The electrical and magentic properties of light cause it to interact with the crystal or other molecular structure of the medium and it is refracted around the charged nucleons and electrons. This causes a lengthening of an apparent straight path. Because light photons have no mass, and only momentum, and due to Conservation of Energy, light recovers from this refration to - and fro as it passes through the medium and elastically it's path is preserved as a straight line

energy in free form (radiation) exists in interwoven loops (as opposed to a double sine folding back on itself)
Rare-Earth magnets (and magnets in general)
Contain superconducted electric currents, but cannot support additional current as the elctrons in question already are occupied by the current they conduct
How else does the laws of physics account for the strong permanent magnetic fields? There must be a corresponding electric current in the equation
ON THAT Note: the search for room-temperature superconductors may be very poised with material science of supermagnets, and low-cost alternative materials such as iron nitride may be the state of the art

Entropy
entropy in the universe is constant
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Mechanics is {in practice} debunked summus totalis: it (erroneously) attempts to eliminate the observer
-asking- no, declaring that the universe suspend a portion of itself so that it's quantum state can be determined is folly and silly: bits of the universe do not stand still simply because we notice them(!) The desciption of the universe in terms of it being only it's infinitely short-termed parts at the exclusion of the remaining universe including the observer in it is clearly nonsense: what is the point of explaining the bits of the universe to no-one?
In practice the universe is alive and cannot be sterilised beyond a certain point at which the purity of physics is substituted for death: it is uneccessary as pure physics is already pure
That is, Quantum Mechanics is a risky attempt at reducing Einstein to tears
In theory, hypothetical and design principle, Quantum Mechanics is brilliant however(!) It is a great approach to building machines and technology. However, once built, it ceases to be meaningful and relativity engulfs and absorbs the finished product
Quantum Entanglement I am advancing that I don't still know how this works in relativity yet: BUT... :) If the speed of light itself has/is a physical boundary, perhaps phenomena can operate by way of being confined to it, and then interact with reality as though the speed of light is like a medium with instantaneous and infinitely fast tensile properties