The purpose of this document is to ban circumcision
The most disruptive and destructive meme on Earth is the parasitic meme circumcision
The meme itself molests the victim
even as one tries to put it away into itself.
It introduces replicating errors that cannot be found easily without extensive effort and loss of the same over and over
It expects empathy from the victim, whilst the victim expects empathy from their environment, but no amount of emapathy ever fixes it
Circumcision is the source AND origin of a generous portion of the world's suffering, the origin of Hell and the origin of evil
The problem with circumcision is this in the West: the court is organised over relative peace, and hears cases in relative tranquility, but depends on precedence inextricably
Why is this such a problem ?
In the case of circumcision there exists no precedent for having already banned it
When one is led into the court, one is greeted by peace and tranquility. One therefore feels obligated to honour that peace. In the case of circumcision, this is a lie, and is both strife and hypocracy
A lot of people have suffered needlessly at both society's whim and the courts' pretence of peace.
In the courts' defence, I will say that they do not intend for anyone to suffer, so it is my job therefore to alleviate their entanglement with suffering by assisting them in comprehension of the need to ban circumcision outright
I do not beleive that the court in the West is in any way intentionally malicious, maliferous or ignorant, though in practice,in the case of circumcision, owing to the loss of what a circumcision effectively costs us, they are not always successful in carying out God's wishes
In Australia, the court is an extention of parliament, and parliament is intended to be an extention of God's will. This is the case because when parliament sits, they do so with a prayer, asking God to enable and permit them to see his will done
I do not believe that they fail in general in succeeding with this prayer
Courts however amy fair less that ideally in the case of circumcision
This must be brought before me
I am already unfortunately close enough to circumcision enough to feel the damage of a circumcision first hand
So
I invite you on a journey
You're walking alone in a desert
You look down and see a boy sitting naked on the sand
The boy looks at you
You look at him
He smiles
He says "Hello. What have you got in your pocket?"
You reach into your pocket and feel a scalpel
"A scalpel", you reply
"Could I have a look at it?", he asks
"You pull the scalpel out and show it to him
"Could you put it down over there?" he asks, pointing to the sand
You oblige, and place the scalpel onto the sand carefully
The scalpel lies on the sand beating it's legs in the hot sun, trying to turn itself over, but it can't. not without your help. But your're not helping
So where did that go with you?
The point is that scalpels and naked boys are not exactly synoymous with safety, or life much as is matters
Now we close this chapter of circumcision and open a very old one
NO
Circumcision was inventeed by pederasty many years ago
I say this not lightly, but after extensive meditation on the matter, thinking and comparing both my own experience and those of others, and contemplating other's experiences.
So clever was this meme that it infected both medicine and the churches, as well as some parts of parliament
Circumcision is pedophilia, produces pedophilia and anticipates pedophilia
Some people are in such entangled space that they believe that little boys and little girls need control of their sexual futures by means of circumcinng little boys (or in some places on this planet, little girls, though in Austrlia we are lucky enough for this to only happen to little boys
This misconception is only brought about by circumcision of little boys who grow up into men believing they are special because they are circumcised and therefore it it up to them to determine what defines a safe little boy or little girl
I know that it is not up to anyone t determine what happens to my little boys' sexual future or idetitiy or whatever you would like to call it but my lttle boy myself
Furthermore I know after extensive meditation on the matter, that I would have zero problmes with sex and myself or anyone else if I was intact between the legs, so to speak
That is, if circumcision were banned I, and everyone would experience significcant sexual security that is these days barely ever realised
The conflict is apparent at the level of parliament becuase they generally prefer peole to be secure, becuase they can then (parlaimentarians) get on with the business of government, instead of empathy bank account fillers
What is the purpose of a foreskin?
Refer foreskin
How would one be if one had the physiology to catch one right where one should be? To stay there once so caught, forever?
I would be thankful, grateful, and happy as can be
I would say so would you and everyone
I did not know until recently that this is the function of the foreskin!
Most people like me believe this is the purpose of the foreskin: to protect the glans from the surrounding environment, including from men (or women) with scalpels!
Futhermore, the foreskin is a aprt of the brain's protection of that interior known as the self
Usually, when I see a boys' penis and it is intact, I see the whole picture (that is, I see a boy), not just a penis, and I am very happy about that
I do not need to see it again.
I do not have any complications
But when I see my own circumcised penis (called a dick) I am not happy. I wish, to that little boy who I saw, I could return the favour when I was a little boy
Seeing a little boy naked leads to happness, with caveat emptor, a few basic rules in place (in my case it is my religion (Gaudiya Vayisnava), my love of physics, and a love of the natural world (trees, rocks, plants, animals and people)